Ramada Review
Based on online research and 28 Ramada reviews, Ramada's overall score is 3.9 out of 5 stars. Ramada's review score is based on Ramada's customer ratings, its brand popularity, its price competitiveness, as well as the breadth and quality of features it offers to customers. The Ramada review table below incorporates summarizes 28 Ramada ratings on 6 features. You can also compare Ramada against popular alternatives like Great Wolf Lodge, Hilton and Best Western. Or you can view the top 50 brands in similar categories, such as travel services, lodging stores and hotel brands.
Brand popularity
eCommerce rating
Payment options
Shipping & returns policies
Coupons & discounts
Customer-specific discounts
Financing options
Company values, ethics & policies
Privacy policy & data security
Loyalty, rewards & partnership programs
Seasonal sales & events
Ramada Review: Ramada Pros & Cons
Ramada (ramada.com) is a smaller hotel brand which competes against other hotel reservation brands like Great Wolf Lodge, Hilton, Best Western, Hotels.com and Bellagio. Based on our in-depth Ramada review, when compared to its competitors, Ramada is a mid-range performing brand within its category. Read the full Ramada.com review below for more details.
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
Knoji has 28 Ramada reviews and ratings as of July 9, 2026. Knoji editors and the Knoji shopper community have reviewed Ramada and compared it against 2,304 top hotels brands, reviewing Ramada based on product and store features. Knoji reviews and ranks Ramada.com and other hotel brands based on how many features each offers and based on a 5-star rating scale. Based on these factors and 28 Ramada reviews, Ramada earns an overall score of 3.9 out of 5.0 points. Ramada offers 6 total features. Ramada's review score also factors in its popularity, which is in the mid-range to lower-range compared to competing .
